ithildin: (Media - Keira: Ocean Profile)
ithildin ([personal profile] ithildin) wrote2010-01-30 11:45 am

150

"Robin Dunbar, a professor of evolutionary anthropology at Oxford University, developed a theory in the 1990s dubbed Dunbar's Number. The theory contends that the human brain is only capable of managing relationships--staying in contact at least once per year and knowing how friends relate to others--with about 150 people."

Sorry, Facebook friends: Our brains can't keep up

[identity profile] grachonok.livejournal.com 2010-01-30 07:00 pm (UTC)(link)
*looks at my LJ-profile* 175, 159 mutual. Well, minus some ghost accounts and journals that I read like newspapers and journals I actually don't read - it will be about 150, yes. And I agree it's the upper limit or very close to it.
shadadukal: (BSG : KaraLeoben floor yellow green)

[personal profile] shadadukal 2010-01-30 07:30 pm (UTC)(link)
That's gotta be the upper limit. Mine's probably lower though.

[identity profile] mischief5.livejournal.com 2010-01-30 08:44 pm (UTC)(link)
I know mine's lower than that. I have the attention span of a gerbil.
ext_3554: dream wolf (Default)

[identity profile] keerawa.livejournal.com 2010-01-31 02:39 am (UTC)(link)
150? I'm lucky if I can keep up with how folks relate to each other for ... 10 people. Of course, that may be the Asperger's.

[identity profile] pat-t.livejournal.com 2010-01-31 10:50 am (UTC)(link)
That's interesting. 150 people seems like a large number. But I guess they are only talking about capability and not what the average number of people/relationships are for a person.