ithildin: (Methos - Look)
On one of the Highlander email lists, I glanced at a few emails on the subject today. There seems to be the sentiment that if only the two sequels had gotten the big budget that the remake's getting, things would have been different. And people seem quite bitter about it. But is that really true? Can you turn a sow's ear into a silk purse? If 'The Source' had had a 55 million dollar budget, it just would have been a more expensive crap movie. In the end, it's the story that makes a movie. If Highlander could grip us with relatively low budget TV episodes, then money isn't the key, IMHO. To my mind, the most hopeful thing about the remake isn't the budget, but that the script is going to be written by people who seem to be able to tell a good story. And a good story is a good story no matter how much money is thrown at it. All the money in the world couldn't have turned 'The Source' into a good movie. Just my good for nothing opinion, of course :)

Date: 2008-06-03 05:54 am (UTC)From: [personal profile] shadadukal
shadadukal: (FS : Zhaan)
I agree with what you say about the story being essential, though a good script can still be ruined by shooting and all. And a big budget doesn't necessarily make a good movie, as we have proof each year I think.

Date: 2008-06-03 04:49 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] darthhellokitty.livejournal.com
Some of the best movies I've seen have had a great script, and practically no budget at all.

August 2018

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 21st, 2026 12:48 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios