The Things I'll Watch

[ithildin]

No, not curling, though that's all my mum seems to have watched for two weeks. The Winter games are her favourite for the curling, which she used to do competitively back in her youth. And then there's hockey. Both my parents and my brother are huge fans - I appear to missed that particular Canadian gene. That being said, I will watch the hockey final and root on the USA, just so there's some balance in my house LOL.

In other news, I'll be posting part eleven of West today. And I think I may be lazy and not post it to All the comms I normally do. Since I don't usually do my comm posting till a day later lately due to time constraints, I notice I get zero comments added after the initial posting on my LJ. So honestly, I'm not sure anyone actually reads the story via any of the comms - you're all here already. And it's a lot of time to waste if it serves no purpose. Maybe I'll do comm posts every other part?

Tuesday, I'm going to Ogden for a work meeting [sigh] I'll be gone most of the week, but am taking the netbook so hope to get some LJ time in the evenings.

Comments

Re: rooting for the USA in hockey

[annasbeta.livejournal.com]

This is true. There isn't a pro female hockey league and there is the NHL. I think what most women here were looking at was the goals. Canadian women definitely out-scored then the men; at one time in the Olympic tournament, the Canadian women had scored 18 goals to 1 goal scored against them. And this was the cummulative score of a couple of games.

When you consider that most NHL games are lucky to have, say 3 to 2, this is an enormous difference. Now I suppose you are arguing that the Men are all competing on the same level, since most of them are all in the NHL. Ok, I agree with you. But so are all the women. It's only been since 2002 that we've started to see some REAL funding going into Women's Canadian Hockey. Like I said, most of the women's players, on any team, can only play it as a "hobby"; there just hasn't been any training anywhere for women players.

Since the Canadian Women won Gold in 2002, there's been a fraction of funding going into Canadian women's hockey and it's really shown this Olympics. At the beginning of the tournament, there was a lot of comment by spectators and commentators that the Canadian women were really decimating their opponents. I think the score of their first game was something realy obscene, like 7 to 0. What i would like people to focus on is this is what women can do with a little funding and some play time. Hopefully, in the next set of Olympics, the US and maybe Russia will decide to seriously challenge Canadian Women and we will get more air time and more commerical funding.

And I don't even like hockey.

Re: rooting for the USA in hockey

[ithildyn.livejournal.com]

Yeah, that's all I was wondering. I thought maybe you had meant that the Canadian women were playing pro players on other teams, so I was confused :) AFAIK, American Olympians get no government support, so it would depend on more corporate support for them. I think it may take a decade or two to grow the sport, since it takes getting a wide reaching network of womens hockey teams starting at school age, then on to college level. But the sport has exploded on to the scene pretty quickly all things considered.