Emotional Attachment & Smutty Fic

[ithildin]

We discussed this on IM last night, and thought it was worth throwing out for conversation.  My musing is such: I've bought and read some of those 'erotica anthologies', and for the most part, they bore me to tears. So I've been wondering if there's a component of having an attachment to a character that adds to the enjoyment of such fic. As in: I find I enjoy 'adult' fanfic with a character I know and care about more than the 'professional' sorts of stories found in published anthologies. With many of those, it's virtually nameless and faceless and I just don't care enough about the participants for the story to be satisfying on any level.  Obviously, there are exceptions. but generally speaking that seems to be the pattern.

Thoughts?

And here's hoping the other participants of last night's conversation share their thoughts.

Comments

[carenejeans.livejournal.com]

Not arguing with you (I think)... but it's the *focus* on the female *body* (and feelings, esp. of the ohgodohgodohgod orgasmic kind, heh) *regardless* of male or female POV that fascinates me. Hey, one story I read was written from the POV of a necklace! 8-) And it still focused on the woman's body.

So, if I were to, just as an example, *coff*, write a crossover with Amanda and Jack Sparrow, I would make it a point to not be focusing so much on Amanda's body. I'm not sure which POV I'll write it from (er, I mean *if* I were writing it, heh heh heh heh) but it doesn't matter, the loving lingering description will be focused on his body. Or would. If I were writing it. *looks up and whistles*

I like to write sex scenes, though I agree they're haaaaard. I see them almost as puzzles to figure out -- how can I make this *work*? I don't mean diagrams for tab A and slot B, but "working" in the sense people don't just skim over it.

You know, in all of the original fiction I've written (including three! unfinished! Nanowrimo novels!) the protagoinists are always women. I don't mean to do that, exactly, I just... do. The secondary characters are women, too. In fact, I DO have to make a conscious effort to include men in the stories. Weird, huh?

[ithildyn.livejournal.com]

Arguing? Agree? Disagree? Sorry, I've been distracted by the bright shiny of hypothetical Jack/Amanda fic [g]

No, no arguments from me, I'm just doing mental meandering and you're helpfully encouraging me :)

All my original fic has been with female protagonists as well, now I'm thinking about it. Hmm.

As for loving descriptions of Jack's body, I like that sort of thing in what I read in general. I do want to know/see that. And now I think I'm getting a stronger sense of what you're talking about. I think. :) I'm slow, what can I say?

Back to Jack specifically... there's a cut scene on the extras on the DVD when he's on the island with Elizabeth and she wants to know if any of the stories about him are true, and he shows her his scars. I can understand why they cut it, because it was a very serious moment in an otherwise lighter scene, but it's stayed with me as a part of how I see Jack when I write him. His body is a visual journal of the hardships and pain he's suffered in his life. Underneath the silly facade he projects is the real Jack. Another cut scene is again between him and Elizabeth, again serious, and now of course, I realize it foreshadows events in Dead Man's Chest. The scene where he shoots Barbossa, the look in his eyes -- that, for me is the real Jack. I call it his 'Methos moment' [g]

Errr... sorry, I didn't mean to go off on a Jack Sparrow thing there.

[carenejeans.livejournal.com]

We can meander along together.

As for loving descriptions of Jack's body, I like that sort of thing in what I read in general. I do want to know/see that. And now I think I'm getting a stronger sense of what you're talking about. I think. :) I'm slow, what can I say?

No, see, you're not slow. This is a really frustrating topic/issue because it seems to be really slippery and hard to grab hold of. I'll be making notes and thinking, "aha!" I've got you now!" and then a minute later, I'm going, "Okay, where'd that idea go..." I think there IS a FORCE FIELD around it.

But I think I'm becomming appalled, really, that there's this unchallenged "default" that SEX=WOMEN that we can't even see. Or am I missing something? Argh! No, I'm not. I *read* those anthologies!! I know what I seen. With my own two eyes! 8-)

Am still working this out...

Ooooh, thanks for the tip on the extra stuff on the DVD -- I just bought it, and I'm still kind of dumb about extra stuff! Those deleted scenes sound useful great. 8-)

[ithildyn.livejournal.com]

Let's see if I am 'getting' it :) Even if a scene is from the woman's perspective, we know how his skin feels under her fingers, the shape of his body, his scent, the way the light plays across his face, the feel of his hair. all the things that make up a real feeling for him as a person, not just some interchangeable guy. All such simple things that are skimped on in many stories, before we even get to actual sex. Written foreplay, maybe Am I warm?

As for the extras on the DVD: I love the island scene, and the 'peas in a pod' scene. Jack has much more depth as a character that gets overlooked with the swaying and the seeming shallowness.