Welcome to the sixteenth installment of Methos Episode Discussion. You can find the last one, for Forgive Us Our Trespasses here. All prior episode discussion links can be found over on the sidebar.
Quotes below the curtain
Duncan: Duncan: Cut the crap - Mike is dead because of him.
Methos: No, Mike is dead because of Mike.
Duncan: The kid idolized him. Maybe he didn't pull the trigger but he sure as hell put the gun in his hand. "To live like me you have to be like me." Come on, Methos, Mike couldn't do that, he wasn't Immortal.
Methos: And that is not Byron's fault
________________________
Byron: My task is done. My song has ceased. My theme has died into an echo...it is fit.
________________________
Byron: Would you rather have a tombstone that says "he lived for centuries', or one that says 'for centuries, he was alive"?
Methos: You're not listening to me - I don't want a tombstone.
________________________
Next up will beIndiscretions aka The Methos & Joe Show 'Archangel'.
The Modern Prometheus, Air Date: May 1997
Lord Byron, the brilliant Romantic poet, is alive and well and living the decadent life of a rock star. He lives life way over the edge and has taken some promising young musicians over the edge with him. When following in Byron's footsteps tragically ends the life of Dawson's protege, MacLeod is faced with a decision -- is the beauty and genius that is Byron worth the cost? ~ recap and quotes via tv.com
Quotes below the curtain
Duncan: Duncan: Cut the crap - Mike is dead because of him.
Methos: No, Mike is dead because of Mike.
Duncan: The kid idolized him. Maybe he didn't pull the trigger but he sure as hell put the gun in his hand. "To live like me you have to be like me." Come on, Methos, Mike couldn't do that, he wasn't Immortal.
Methos: And that is not Byron's fault
________________________
Byron: My task is done. My song has ceased. My theme has died into an echo...it is fit.
________________________
Byron: Would you rather have a tombstone that says "he lived for centuries', or one that says 'for centuries, he was alive"?
Methos: You're not listening to me - I don't want a tombstone.
________________________
Next up will be
no subject
Date: 2006-06-12 05:51 pm (UTC)From:Another episode with insights into Methos (how close was he to Byron?) and very enjoyable for a Mary Shelly fan like me.
Some of those flashbacks were very risque I liked that :)
OT: Browsing tv channels over the weekend discovered HL on FX and watched with great enjoyment Epitaph for Tommy and Run for Your Life. I loved Duncan saving Carl in the latter from getting hanged and getting shot himself for his troubles.
Will keep a look out on the schedules from now on.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-12 05:59 pm (UTC)From:Then there's the fact that Duncan is still judging people and so soon after FUOT. Yeah, Byron was a loser, but Methos was right, he didn't kill Mike. If stupidity were a crime... Heh.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-12 06:19 pm (UTC)From:Okay, to start I felt very sorry for Byron. He was sad. He should have never been immortal. There was no way he could maintain that much drama and fill that much need for centuries. And inside where it counted, he was already dying.
Mike - that
stupidyoung man was responsible for his own decisions. He was an adult and Joe was trying to help him. And basically, he told Joe where to get off.*But* - and here is the thing - Byron used people's weaknesses against them - knowing they would self destruct just like he did. The only difference - they didn't get up and go on living afterward. And in the present - that is how Byron fed his need for Immortality. Not with his poetry - not with his passion. But by watching others self-destruct and knowing he would go on when they didn't.
Duncan - yes he judged. But something Duncan could never tolerate was an Immortal usiing their immortality to bring harm to others. And I think it was only because Byron was Methos' former friend and lover - that Duncan backed off long enough to issue a warning.
And Byron - was he trying to commit suicide or was this the ultimate test of self-destruction - this time with someone who had just as much chance of getting up as he did afterward. But if he killed MacLeod and continued to live after that challenge - was that the next level of high - one he was no longer obtaining with the Mikes of the world. Then what? Become a hunter - taking bigger risks until finally he lost?
I tend to cut Duncan some slack here. He truly cares about people and he didn't want to hurt Methos.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:jealousy?
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:The Bounds of Decency
Date: 2006-06-12 06:53 pm (UTC)From:While I'm pondering Pat's three parter [g], I did want to mention the flashback. First off the shallow bit: Methos in breeches! Okay, now on to the serious bit.
If anyone still had any questions as to if Methos had really changed, I think this is as good an example as any that he had. First off, he's genuinely gentle and caring with Mary. Talk about bedside manner! Then we get to the bedroom scene, where Byron is all for a threesome with the defenseless Mary. Methos is the one to put the brakes on, to remind Byron of decency, and basically takes on the role of Mary's protector. And all this on his own, without the influence of Duncan.
I absolutely adore the flashbacks in this episode. So much more of Methos is revealed, so many more reasons to love him :)
Re: The Bounds of Decency
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Re: The Bounds of Decency
From:Re: The Bounds of Decency
From:Re: The Bounds of Decency
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-12 07:49 pm (UTC)From:Joe really interests me most, as Methos' reaction is understandable. He's not ready to face Duncan yet, literally turning away.
But Joe - Joe doesn't look pleased. Relieved that Duncan's alive, perhaps, but not pleased. Joe knows the extent of what's been lost by both deaths. Note that Joe never asked for Byron's death. Didn't ask Duncan to get involved. He wasn't happy with what Byron did, his sick games with Mike, but I go the impression he knew down deep that in the end what happened to Mike was up to Mike. I also felt that he was as disappointed in Mike as he was upset at his death. Mike didn't live up to his potential. Mike failed to make the smart choice. And in the end he paid for that.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-12 08:21 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-12 08:58 pm (UTC)From:Basically, I am a firm believer that adults - even young adults - make their own choices and have to live and die by them. Nobody forced Byron's life style on Mike. Mac should have minded his own business and stayed out of this.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-12 09:19 pm (UTC)From:It's interesting to compare him to Gregor in "Studies In Light" -- he's also suicidal, also hates his immortality, and also wants to get close to mortals' deaths, but he only uses a camera. It's sick and creepy, but he doesn't *kill* people. So, in the end, Duncan spares him (and "saves" him as well). Byron is too far gone down the path to self-destruction, and instead of erm, falling on his own sword, he commits suicide by proxy. He *does* kill people.
He's also reckless -- part it's arrogance, but a lot of it's desperation. The scene on the rooftop where Byron's hanging on to the pole and screaming for the lightning to come and get him is telling, I think.
And the lighting does come -- in the form of Duncan.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:It's a Rotten Job...
Date: 2006-06-13 01:59 am (UTC)From:Re: It's a Rotten Job...
From:Re: It's a Rotten Job...
From:Re: It's a Rotten Job...
From:Re: It's a Rotten Job...
From:Re: It's a Rotten Job...
From:Re: It's a Rotten Job...
From:Re: It's a Rotten Job...
From:Re: It's a Rotten Job...
From:Re: It's a Rotten Job...
From:Re: It's a Rotten Job...
From:Re: It's a Rotten Job...
From:Jealousy
Date: 2006-06-13 04:27 am (UTC)From:And there is another minor mystery--Mike was making his first appearance guesting with Joe's band in Paris--it would be very unlikely that Byron would have heard of the green kid. Was he trolling for bigger fish? One look at Joe, and Byron dismisses him with consummate rudeness. I hazard a (possibly crackpot) theory that Byron realized there was no way he was going to manipulate Joe with flattery or promises, and he immediately set his sights on the easier inexperienced target.
With malice aforethought...his creative spark sputtered, and Byron now indulged in creativity's mirror, destruction.
Re: Jealousy
From:Re: Jealousy
From:Re: Jealousy
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-13 10:53 am (UTC)From:At least one commenter above said that Duncan didn't come off as judgmental until this episode; I think, however, that the HL writers really went out of their way to make Duncan judgmental in several eps, it's just that until TMP, you couldn't really disagree with his judgments. I was rewatching Valkyrie, CAH/Rev, and FUOT, and it's interesting how the theme of judgment and forgiveness is explicitly stated in all of them -- there was some real planning there, which I appreciate.
TMP, however, was the first time where you really question Duncan's judgment, because the "threat" Byron poses is, as everyone has said, merely influential.
As for why Duncan has different standards for mortals and immortals, I think that's simple: Mortal justice can deal with mortal criminals, but not immortal ones. That's why Duncan has to step in when immortals are posing threats.
(no subject)
From:An Honest Question
Date: 2006-06-13 03:53 pm (UTC)From:My assumption was, based on the amount of drugs, alcohol, and farm animals we saw in the flashbacks, that there was a great deal of casual sex going on -- orgy is about the only word I can think of that fits -- group sex, perhaps. Granted, we don't see that, but it was a TV show [g] They're chasing the maids around, Percy is making out with a woman who is not his wife, and the scene where the woman is pouring wine down her leg kind of sealed that impression for me, if what I'd seen already hadn't done so. So while Byron and Methos may have had sexual contact, that doesn't mean 'lovers' to me. To me that implies two people in a committed romantic relationship, and Byron just doesn't seem to be that guy.
Then there's the bedroom scene with Byron, Mary, and Methos. Byron is under the influence, wanting to break every taboo he can, indulge in the forbidden and exciting, and he really wants Methos to do it with him. Methos is obviously tempted, but puts the brakes on and tells Byron to basically knock it off. Again, nothing in that scene screams 'lovers' to me, just general licentiousness.
What I took away from the episode as far as the relationship between the two of them was one of a very strong teacher/student bond, mentor/protege, and friendship.
So now I'm very interested in the other side of the coin, and I think this is the right crowd to ask :)
Re: An Honest Question
From:Re: An Honest Question
From:Re: An Honest Question
From:Re: An Honest Question
From:Re: An Honest Question
From:Re: An Honest Question
From:Re: An Honest Question
From:Re: An Honest Question
From:Re: An Honest Question
From:Re: An Honest Question
From:Re: An Honest Question
From:Re: An Honest Question
From:Re: An Honest Question
From:Watcher Chronicles
From:Re: Watcher Chronicles
From:Re: Watcher Chronicles
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-06-21 05:38 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Watcher Chronicles
From:Re: Watcher Chronicles
From:Re: Watcher Chronicles
From: