So George Lucas based Luke on himself, and Gene Roddenberry based Wesley on himself, and those are just two are off the top of my head, and now, I discover that one of the creators of How I Met Your Mother based Ted on himself and the other creator, Marshall. Yet I never see the screams of 'MARY SUE!' that I'm sure would exist if these guys were women.
Just an observation.
Ted was originally modeled on you, and Marshall on Craig. How far have those characters evolved from that? Do you ever sit around and say, "I wouldn't do that" or "We wouldn't do that to each other"?
Ted certainly isn't me anymore. I haven't been engaged, or had a lot of the other experiences he's had. It's more the characters have become themselves .We definitely do try to ask ourselves, "Would this happen to us? Would this happen to someone we know?" for all the characters. We try to keep them personal and real, but there's more overlap now. I relate to Marshall as much as I do to Ted.
Full text here, but it is spoilerish for the last ep of the season.
Just an observation.
Ted was originally modeled on you, and Marshall on Craig. How far have those characters evolved from that? Do you ever sit around and say, "I wouldn't do that" or "We wouldn't do that to each other"?
Ted certainly isn't me anymore. I haven't been engaged, or had a lot of the other experiences he's had. It's more the characters have become themselves .We definitely do try to ask ourselves, "Would this happen to us? Would this happen to someone we know?" for all the characters. We try to keep them personal and real, but there's more overlap now. I relate to Marshall as much as I do to Ted.
Full text here, but it is spoilerish for the last ep of the season.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 03:42 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 04:31 am (UTC)From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 04:23 am (UTC)From:In my mind the ultimate Mary Sue is Lana from Smallville.
Ted is a flawed character - if he was a true Marty Sue we would never hear about his failures (lost his job/left at the alter) only his ability to do everything perfectly.
I do think the term Mary Sure is routinely supplied to any OFC and you and I both know that is not the case.
Sorry We've talked about this before and i get so angry about the Mary sue label. Charlotte is not a Mary Sue. But I do agree that OMCs are more accepted than OFCs
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 04:30 am (UTC)From:Yeah, I realize it's the reality of today's fandom, but it doesn't mean I can't bitch about it :)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 05:50 am (UTC)From:and even acknowledged Mary-Sues can actually be fun to read and write
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 05:52 am (UTC)From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 07:22 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 07:32 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 08:48 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 08:52 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 09:07 am (UTC)From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 06:37 pm (UTC)From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 08:59 am (UTC)From:I have an almost pathological hatred of badly portrayed female characters (whether in fandom or in canon). It's one of the things I hate about gundam wing (my main anime fandom). Some of the main female characters are basically just there to look pretty and take up space (though bizarrely some of the more minor female characters are awesome).
I'm much more forgiving about male characters (maybe I just care about them less). I love the interesting male characters and pretty much ignore the boring ones.
I absolutely adore strong, interesting and fun female characters. One of the reasons I love highlander, they have fantastic canon female characters- Amanda (for example). Anyone who can write an intersting OFC has my admiration. For some reason I find female characters much harder to write than male, (which is why I write them so occasionally and so slowly). I have no idea why this should be, you would think it'd be the other way round.
PS absolutely agree Lana is a Mary Sue, I find her very irritating.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 11:25 am (UTC)From:Lets see - she's beautiful (and everyone on the show who sees her thinks she is). She flirts with all the male characters and they lose their minds, give into her and totally sell one another out. Look at Richie, Duncan and Joe. Even Methos gets a little funny around her.
She wears the skin tight clothes. Another woman wanted to be her so badly she changed her own hair and wardrobe to look like her.
No matter what she does, Duncan takes up for her - risks his life for her. Even when it hurt Tessa. Even though she's betrayed him and almost gotten him killed.
She somehow manages to outsmart, outcon, out flirt everyone so that she has managed to live over 1000 years.
She's just so pretty and perky and *perfect*. Rebecca looked over her trying to steal from her and still opened her arms to her. Even though she never showed us any great sword skills, she still won over all the big bad guys.
Duncan looked over *all* her moral shortcomings because she was just so irresistable.
You couldn't write a more perfect *fits the profile* Mary Sue.
Unless....
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 11:33 am (UTC)From:You're writing Alexa. Ahhh, dear Alexa. Long blonde hair. Big blue eyes. Tiny, sweet little thing with such an engaging smile and tangy personality that Methos fell madly, passionately in love with her within 3 minutes of them meeting.
So in love that he was willing to throw in the Watchers, Duncan and buy two airline tickets to Paris so he could sweep her away and show her the world. Even if it meant he would have to come out of hiding.
Even her name is beautiful, Methos sighed as he became instantly obsessed and Gobsmacked with her perfection.
And, of course, she wasn't *just* a waitress. She had to be a *special* waitress that Joe cared about and watched over.
Those two (Amanda and Alexa were the ultimate *meets the definition word by word) of all Mary Sues.
There was one female character on Highlander who does *not* meet that definition. She was gorgeous, but she wasn't perfect. Other men didn't necessarily fall over themselves when they saw her. She was interesting and flawed and sometimes just a bit obnoxious. Duncan loved her, but you knew it was true love in spite of her faults. Not the *sees just so cute and makes me laugh* so I can't see her faults like Amanda.
I'm talking about Tessa. She was a spitfire. She got jealous. She didn't take any shit from our guy. She stayed up and worried about him when he didn't come home. And she had no problem being a snippy bitch when she was in a bad mood. She was real!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 06:39 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 09:05 am (UTC)From:I will say my favorite example I've seen of a male writer talking about his Marty Stu was Chuck Jones talking about Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck. He said Bugs was his perfect character that got away with everything while Daffy was his everyman. ;)
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 06:34 pm (UTC)From:Yes, we go way back on the whole girl issue.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 03:11 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 06:33 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 04:35 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 06:32 pm (UTC)From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 06:11 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 06:32 pm (UTC)From:(but I can't go read it till I've seen the movie!)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 06:56 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 06:58 pm (UTC)From:(no subject)
From: